← Journal

Essay · June 25, 2026

We don't just lack third spaces, we've lost far more than that.

"Decadence is sophistication in the absence of substance." — Terence McKenna

"Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because, and only when, they are created by everybody." — Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities (1961)

"Un mundo donde quepan otros mundos" — "a world where many worlds fit." — Zapatista saying

I came out of the queer late 90's LA punk scene, and I can tell you exactly what made that scene so special — and that I've spent years trying to find something similar again. It was dense in intersectionality before that word existed, before it was a course offering or a brand value or a panel topic. It was just what happened when people with different damage and different dreams showed up to the same room for reasons they couldn't entirely explain.

Music was the binding force, but it would not be uncommon to see an emo band, a straight edge act, a powerviolence group, and a glitch DJ in the same set. The real show, though, was in the crowd. Diverse in politics, gender expression, aesthetics and philosophy, it would not be unusual to grab a zine about herbal womb care from the table by the door, then help a crust punk load in their gear, move onto a skate session out back with the straight edgers, only to smoke a cigarette with the hot mod girls on the way back in. That circuitous route — through ideas as much as through people — was the point. It made the space rich, tolerant, accepting. You could try on different identities, subvert your own, play with irony in lived situations constantly. The meaning wasn't posted on the wall. It was moving through the room.

The best third spaces have always worked this way — not through intention but through accumulated accident. Think of any well-worn European town square, the kind that wasn't designed so much as arrived at over centuries: merchants and monks, teenagers and grandmothers, the market and the argument and the idle afternoon all layered on top of each other until the stones themselves seemed to hold memory. What made those places work wasn't charm. It was friction held in productive tension. Old and young. Sacred and profane. Commerce and loitering. Residents and strangers. The contradictions weren't resolved — they were held. And in that holding, something happened to the people moving through them. You left different than you arrived. Not necessarily changed in any legible way, but stretched. Your sense of what was possible — in yourself, in others — had quietly moved.

What that kind of space generates is impossible to fake and very easy to destroy. It requires density of difference — not the decorative kind, but the kind where the differences actually mean something, where they rub up against each other and produce heat. The usefulness of a space is not in its concept. It's in its capacity for unplanned encounter. When a room only serves one kind of person for one kind of purpose, it isn't a community anchor. It's a waiting room with better lighting.

What the punk scene had — and what genuine third spaces have always had — was the structural condition for meaning to accrete. Meaning doesn't come pre-packaged. It requires friction. It requires the refusal to resolve too quickly. A scene, a square, a neighborhood block that still has its weird old hardware store next to the taqueria next to the record shop that's been there since 1987 — these places work because they haven't been optimized. The strangeness is still in them. The weirdness hasn't been consulted on, vetted, and tastefully installed.

A space that sanitizes out all friction has also sanitized out all possibility of genuine transformation. What remains is aesthetic. Form without content. Sensation without consequence.

Rather talk than read?

Book a free twenty-minute call any time.

Book your free consultation